Organisation
Young-earth creationist ministry that has published critiques of Durupınar and NAMI claims.
5 disputed
↳ responds to Sivas Cumhuriyet University and Noah's Ark Scans run a 2026 field season at Durupınar
Nate Loper argued that the reported radar, soil and drilling observations remain compatible with the site's natural geology, and that the 1979 Galbraith analyses look closer to rock and carbonate than petrified wood.
↳ responds to Noah's Ark Scans publishes a radar report saying Durupınar is "not geological"
Responding to headlines calling the Durupınar identification "100% confirmed", Ken Ham wrote that Answers in Genesis does not believe Noah's Ark has been found at the site and warned against sensationalism.
↳ responds to Noah's Ark Scans says soil tests and re-analysed radar suggest a man-made structure
Ken Ham, quoting geologist Andrew Snelling, wrote that the 2025 publicity mostly recycles claims made since the 1980s and refuted by skeptics and creationist geologists.
No entries 2012–2024
↳ responds to NAMI announces wooden structure on Ararat as Noah's Ark
Writing for Answers in Genesis, Andrew Snelling examined NAMI's radiocarbon report and argued the 4,800 BP result does not support the wood being from the Ark.
No entries 1993–2010
↳ responds to Wyatt, Fasold and Baumgardner survey Durupınar with radar
Andrew Snelling's Creation magazine report argued the Durupınar formation is natural and criticised the methods and claims promoted by Ron Wyatt and others.